ACRI · Cost Model
Plastic-Modified Bitumen · Dry Process

What does displacing imported bitumen with recovered plastic actually save?

An interactive model for the FCT road context. Adjust the project size, the bitumen price, and the displacement rate to see the avoided-import cost, the plastic absorbed, and the waste-diversion impact. Built on current 2026 market figures and standard asphalt mix design.

Project Inputs
Carriageways (directions)
FCDA: arterials, collectors & expressways are dual; local streets single
Lanes 2
Lane width 3.65 m
Shoulder / carriageway 2.0 m
Paved shoulder width added per carriageway (set 0 to exclude)
Layers plastic-modified
Surfacing courses carry the strongest dry-process evidence
Road length 5 km
Computed paved width 18.6 m
Built from lanes × width × carriageways + shoulders
Bitumen content 5.2%
% of mix by weight (typical 4.5–7%)
Bitumen price ₦1.38m / t
Per tonne, delivered. Apr 2026 market: ₦1.35–1.4m ex-works
Plastic displacement 8%
% of binder replaced by recovered plastic (dry process: typ. 6–10%)
Mix density 2,400 kg/m³
Compacted HMA (typ. 2,300–2,500)
Bitumen Import Cost Avoided
₦0
across the whole project
Total Asphalt Mix
0 t
compacted hot mix
Bitumen Required
0 t
at full binder content
Plastic Absorbed
0 t
recovered ROBA into the road

Bitumen-bearing layers in scope

FCDA build-up · layers being plastic-modified

Binder composition with displacement

How the binder splits once recovered plastic replaces part of the bitumen
Bitumen
Plastic
Bitumen retained · 0 t Plastic displacing bitumen · 0 t

The economics

Per-project, on the inputs at left
Bitumen needed without plastic
0 t · ₦0
Bitumen needed with plastic displacement
0 t · ₦0
Bitumen cost avoided
₦0
Equivalent per kilometre
₦0 / km

WHY THIS LANDS RIGHT NOW

The Federal Ministry of Works has confirmed bitumen, cement and diesel prices rose over 80% in three years, and the Minister is actively pushing contractors away from asphalt toward concrete to cut imported bitumen dependence. Partial plastic displacement speaks directly to that stated federal priority — it reduces the import bill without abandoning asphalt.

On an Abuja corridor, the Ministry's own subsisting asphalt unit rate was about ₦11,000/m², with real cost cited nearer ₦20,000/m² — so binder savings compound against an already-stressed budget.

Road geometry & layers. Layer build-up follows FCDA cross-section drawings: surfacing is 40mm wearing + 60mm binder (100mm); the heavier dual-carriageway spec adds a 150mm bitumen macadam roadbase (250mm total), selected via the layer toggle. Prime-coat bitumen is negligible and excluded. Paved width is now built from geometry — carriageways × (lanes × lane width + shoulder) — rather than a single corridor figure. This is deliberately more conservative and more defensible than the earlier 33m/40m "bituminous section" numbers, which were likely corridor allocations rather than continuous laid asphalt and overstated tonnage by roughly 2×. Default lane width 3.65m; adjust to the FCDA standard if it differs.

Mix design. Per layer: area = length x width; volume = area x layer thickness; mix weight = volume x density; bitumen = mix weight x bitumen content; summed across layers in scope. One bitumen-content figure is applied to all layers for simplicity. In reality the macadam roadbase typically runs a lower binder content (~4%) than the wearing course, so the full-scope bitumen figure is a slight over-estimate. Set the bitumen-content and shoulder figures to the actual project values before presenting.

Bitumen price. April 2026 trade reporting put Nigerian truck/ex-works prices at ₦1.35–1.4m per tonne ($1,006–1,043/t), rising, up from ₦1.25–1.35m earlier. Default ₦1.38m is mid-range; delivered-to-FCT will run higher once inland transport is added.

Displacement rate. Dry-process plastic addition typically substitutes a single-digit percentage of binder. Default 8% is illustrative and conservative-to-moderate; the real figure must come from NBRRI / mix-design testing for the specific LDPE/PP feedstock. Evidence is strongest for the surfacing courses — the macadam-roadbase ("full scope") option is the volume play but the less-proven one, and should be treated as an upside case pending validation. Treat the plastic-absorbed tonnage as recovered ROBA diverted from waste.

What this model does NOT include. Aggregate, transport, plant, labour, processing cost of the recovered plastic, or performance/durability effects. It isolates the bitumen-import line only — deliberately, because that is the line the displacement touches. A full cost-benefit case needs the processing cost of ROBA netted against the bitumen saving.

Use. Indicative model for cohort and FCDA conversations. Replace the price and displacement defaults with a real delivered-FCT bitumen quote and NBRRI test results before presenting as anything other than indicative.